Vpo 222 420 and 520 which is better
P\S Don’t pay attention to me, I always say what I think and constantly have problems because of this..
What kind of tuning is it (names)?
———- Bring a long gun to a gunfight. Bring all you friends with the long guns.
Who the hell knows its mother until I figure it out, I don’t have it on 222, but I do have it on 156, maybe the experts can tell me.
Question to the Comrades: What is the bracket on the chassis? (or I'm asking the wrong question) I need to install Nikon Monarch 3 (1-4) on Nomad-3. Tell me what I can use to attach it to.
Thank you. Ordered. And then on the side he walks a lot. The bar itself breathes.
Owners or who have held a 222 with a 590 barrel, please tell me.
Is it true that the folded stock of the L=590 blocks the shot, just like the shorter versions?
If so, then why? After all, its rated length with the stock folded is 830 mm, which is longer than the 800 mm prescribed by law. Perhaps only the manufacturer knows the reason.. Unification? Taking into account the length of the DTK?
If I somehow remove the blocking, then the problem may only be with the guarantee, but not with the law. I'm right? See the previous paragraph about 800 and 830 mm.
Don’t ask me why) I’m still a pure theorist, I’m just about to apply for permission. Now there are only MP-61, and that Eska)
Is it true that the folded stock of the L=590 blocks the shot, just like the shorter versions? .
Not true. The VPO-222 with a barrel length of 590 shoots with the butt folded. There's just no point in it.
What is better to take with or without a weaver plank? I saw a lot of negativity towards the vpo-222 with the weaver bar (play, etc.).
What is better to take with or without a weaver plank? I saw a lot of negativity towards the vpo-222 with the weaver bar (play, etc.).
I don’t know how negative this can be called. Here people's opinions are simply divided. It’s just that when there was this strip on the receiver cover, you had to bother with a special high bracket for the optics, since the standard one won’t fit there. But it won’t be possible to install normal optics on an existing bar, or rather it will work, but since the optics are heavy, the whole thing will instantly come loose. Hammer himself did not recommend putting anything heavier than 600 grams there, it seems. In short, there is maximum space for collimators. But here, too, they say that over time the lid becomes loose, although no matter how many reviews I have seen, everywhere the lid rises with effort and does not play. That's all. If you need any good optics, then it is advisable to take it without a bar on the lid, and if you don’t need it, then don’t care at all. In addition, there are still questions regarding the existing fasteners on the side “about two rivets”, which they promised to solve over time in favor of three rivets, but I have not heard about such changes yet. In any case, this receiver cover does not affect accuracy, range, or anything else in ballistics.
Source
Security measures
To ensure safety, the designers of the Molot-Weapon enterprise equipped the carbine with an additional safety lever. It is located behind its axis and can be easily inserted into a safe position.
The VPO-222 carbine must be transported and stored only in an unloaded state. The cartridges are stored separately (not in the store). Charging does not cause much trouble, so this requirement must be observed in any case.
Case for transporting a hunting rifle
Vpo 222 420 and 520 which is better
Actually, I installed it and shot it yesterday. In terms of the quality of workmanship, in principle, there is something to complain about (for example, the unevenness and durability of the coating, the presence of a slight slip, which is visible when quickly tightening the thread), but given its price and the absence of problems with operation, all these questions simply disappear.
After unpacking, I immediately unscrewed the DTK and washed it with warm soapy water. Then, after drying, I wiped the surfaces with oil and wiped off the excess with a dry rag.
After a couple of test shots, I took off my headphones. There is no discomfort felt when shooting. The sound has become duller, is not associated with a rifled shot, and the volume is again comparable to 12 gauge. According to a fellow hobbyist, compared to the regular one, the sound changed in tone, became duller and, most importantly, noticeably lost in intensity, no longer hitting the ears.
They specifically tried to see the muzzle flash, but it didn’t work; of course, its traces should appear in the twilight, but on the whole the result suits me in this aspect as well.
quote: Originally posted by unname22:
That is, it’s impossible to knock him down so easily..
quote: Originally written by unname22: In general, I pretend to have a brief overview of the DTK from comrade bdk
The third option is to remove the DTK altogether. There is an adjustable gas block, the recoil is reduced. For several shots on a hunt, it’s never critical. And headphones will save you from concussion.
quote: Originally posted by android_jzx90:
Greetings! I have VPO 221-01. I installed the same sight (cross reticle), Kron Tula-est. No complaints, I didn’t wear the rings.
maks592 There is a partisan level.
quote: Originally posted by maks592: But it’s interesting. Will it be possible to order the installation of a rail instead of a rear sight at the factory? Because the Nomad IMHO is rather weak for the Nikon Moharch 3. And it’s not the scope. The point is the gap between the bar and the SC. There is a gap closer to the lid. Either fill it with something, or whatever. There is a solution to install a second screw, but it is difficult to do it yourself. There you need to weld the recess, drill and cut the thread, then redo the strip (drill and countersink). Yes, and steel will be more interesting. + welding There is an option to weld the side bar to the gun, but the walls are a bit thin, and it may crack later.
At the exhibition, the hammer announced a bar welded to the rear sight block, on VPO-213 It seems like they will install these on our boars in the 2nd half of 19.
Or buy a Kovrovsky Partizan, the crowbar is no worse and is installed without welding, only the hole on the block will have to be welded with one drop. I found performers without difficulty.
quote: Originally posted by unname22: I didn’t weld it, I just put it on the thread and made an epoxylin insert.
Like put a cold weld between them?
It was installed by the jack of all trades Ivan Skripkin from the 13 gauge weapons workshop. As, indeed, the bar and the sight. Classwork.
question. It’s clear, but you can link to the frame.
question. It’s clear, but you can link to the frame.
Placed on a ring gasket made of sheet metal exactly 0.5 mm thick.
quote: Originally written by Kirill_Z: Sorry for the slight off-topic, but it seems to me that it makes sense for Molot to make a model with pump-action reloading based on the VPO-222 (similar to how Izhmash made a pump-action model of the 223 Remington caliber based on the Saiga-223). For a powerful 9.6/53 mm cartridge, the difference in the firing rate of a pump and a semi-automatic will be insignificant. In this case, the pump will be a little lighter (there is no gas outlet mechanism) and, most importantly, radically easier to clean.
Anyone want to buy a VPO-222 designed like the VPO-213 at the exhibition (with a long weaver rail with a diopter sight on the sighting block, a gas block with a plug, a frame with a left-hand reload handle, a compact safety and a sports body kit)?
quote: Originally written by confident: Has anyone measured the speed of a bullet on a short barrel? And energy?
For long-range accurate shots there will be a rifled bolt gun.
quote: Originally written by DBA2018: After reading the forum on the hammer website, I realized that you can wait forever for a 10-round magazine.
A working and tested option is to make one out of two, a one-and-a-half spring, the ends are overlapped and spliced with a metal tube - it was here: https://m.vk.com/lancastergun?from=groups
quote: Originally posted by Lexey 735th:
A working and tested option is to make one out of two, a one-and-a-half spring, the ends are overlapped and spliced with a metal tube - it was here: https://m.vk.com/lancastergun?from=groups
Another option I found was the SGM Tactical 7.62×53 magazine peeling.
Maybe there is something else simpler?
Another option I found was the SGM Tactical 7.62×53 magazine peeling.
Maybe there is something else simpler?
Not yet. As for peeling, I haven’t seen a single report on this option yet. Theoretically, it is possible to saw down, just as the standard 5-round Veprev magazines were sawed down in the first place, and the walls were “thinned.” But this magazine is twice as long, how to cut it inside?
quote: Originally written by freediverhunter: I wonder if there are any gadgets in nature for the vpo222 so that the butt folds towards the bolt
No. But in the future there will be 222 kits a la vpo 213, announced at the last exhibition - a folding stock to the right, a left cocking handle, a picatinny rail welded to the rear sight block. And change the handle to the right one. Now you can order individually from the factory, people have already bothered with at least 6 pieces. And even then, the cocking handle on the right will conflict with the folded butt.
quote: Originally posted by Barsek: My perversions continue as always.
Where did you get the forend? Sawn or specially for boar?
quote: Originally written by Barsek: Yes, it wasn’t lying around from the old device. I sharpened it a little and installed it. So far I still don’t understand what I need. Everything that is sold is very bulky and I don’t like it. I want something like the one on my 223. Or even just a tire.
I have an understanding, but there’s still no handguard. All the manufacturers have given up on us, they don’t care about us.
here is a description of FAB GL-Shоsk stock (replica). Made in China. Black. For installation on mil-spec pipe. No caliber restrictions. Ideal for installation on Saiga, Vepr 12 gauge, as well as Tiger.
But based on the forend I can’t decide which is better, I would like to put either plastic or carbon so that my hands don’t freeze in winter
quote: has anyone tried this butt, I’m thinking of installing one for myself and a Blazer-type dtk
quote: Originally written by freediverhunter: has anyone tried this butt, I’m thinking about installing one for myself and a Blazer-type dtk
here is a description of FAB GL-Shоsk stock (replica). Made in China. Black. For installation on mil-spec pipe. No caliber restrictions. Ideal for installation on Saiga, Vepr 12 gauge, as well as Tiger.
Fab's original is good; No one knows what this replica is, there may be unpleasant surprises both during installation and during operation. It's worth the sweat of the blazer type, I'm happy. There aren’t really any tubular forends on boars, so for now it’s just collective farming. I'm waiting for the forend from LAC, he feeds everyone with breakfast. So far it looks like this:
Source
Detailed review of the VPO-222 hunting carbine of the Vepr-1V series
Many models of smoothbore hunting rifles have not only a convenient design that makes shooting comfortable and easy, but also a high lethality. The Russian enterprise “Molot-Weapon” produces a whole line of similar carbines, known as “Vepr” and briefly designated by the abbreviation VPO.
These products have many positive qualities, and, most importantly, they are suitable for professional hunting, recreational and sport shooting. Of the entire line, carbines called “Vepr-1V” stand out in a special way. This series includes several samples of smoothbore shotguns, which includes the VPO-222.
general description
We are talking about a self-loading smoothbore carbine designed specifically for firing 9.6/53 Lancaster cartridges. Lancaster is a foreign analogue of the well-known domestic cartridge of 7.62×54 mm R caliber. A characteristic feature of these guns is an elongated barrel. For the VPO-222 model, in particular, it varies in the range:
- 420 mm;
- 520 mm;
- 590 mm;
- 700 mm.
VPO-222 shotguns with different barrel lengths
Such a wide range of sizes is due to the possibility of choosing smooth-bore weapons, taking into account the area of application. Of course, the Vepr-1V VPO-222 carbine with a barrel length of 700 mm will have higher power, but at the same time it is more difficult to transport and carry than it is inferior to a gun with a barrel length of only 420 mm. The choice is determined by the preferences of the shooter himself.
